The legal status of cannabis, particularly for medical use, varies widely across different jurisdictions, reflecting a complex tapestry of laws and regulations that govern its accessibility and control. This essay explores how various regions manage medical cannabis, highlighting the diversity in legal frameworks from stringent prohibitions to liberal allowances.
In the United States, the legality of medical cannabis is determined at the state level, leading to a patchwork of regulations. As of now, over 30 states have legalized cannabis for medical purposes. Each state has its own list of qualifying conditions for which medical cannabis can be prescribed, and these can include chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, cancer-related symptoms, and epilepsy among others. However, federal law still classifies cannabis as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, making it illegal federally and creating conflicts between state and federal laws.
Moving northwards to Canada, the scenario changes significantly. Cannabis was legalized nationwide for both medical and recreational use in October 2018 with the Cannabis Act. Canadians need authorization from healthcare providers to purchase medical cannabis which can be obtained through licensed producers or growers. This uniform policy across all provinces simplifies access but also imposes strict regulations on production and distribution to ensure safety and quality.
In contrast, countries like Japan maintain stringent anti-cannabis laws where possession or use is heavily penalized and not distinguished between recreational or medicinal uses. Such strictness stems from cultural attitudes as well as historical precedents regarding drug use.
European nations exhibit considerable variation in their approach to medical cannabis. Germany legalized it for medicinal purposes in 2017 with prescriptions available primarily for severe conditions when other treatment options fail or cause significant side effects. The German government also covers these prescriptions under health insurance schemes which is not common in all jurisdictions that allow medicinal usage.
On another front, Australia has been moving towards more progressive cannabis policies since 2016 when amendments were made to narcotics laws allowing legal cultivation for medicinal purposes. Patients require prescriptions from doctors who need special licenses to prescribe this treatment option.
These diverse approaches reflect differing national attitudes towards drug policy enforcement, public health priorities, cultural influences, patient advocacy groups pressure levels amongst other factors. While some countries see it primarily as a matter of public health others view it through the lens of criminal justice or moral standards.
As global perspectives on marijuana shift largely due to increasing research validating its therapeutic benefits international harmonization remains elusive given deep-rooted beliefs about drug consumption whether therapeutic or otherwise each region's history informs its stance producing an intricate mosaic rather than a uniform policy landscape regarding medical cannabis regulation.
Medical Uses of Cannabis
The recreational use of cannabis, which refers to the use of marijuana for personal enjoyment rather than for medical purposes, has seen a significant transformation in legal frameworks across various jurisdictions. This essay explores the evolving legal status of cannabis, focusing on different international approaches and the implications of these laws.
Historically, cannabis was widely prohibited worldwide, with stringent penalties imposed for its possession, use, or distribution. The basis for such strict regulation stemmed primarily from concerns over health effects, potential for abuse, and moral and social issues associated with its use. However, recent decades have witnessed a dramatic shift in perception and law regarding cannabis, particularly in Western countries.
In the United States, the movement toward legalizing recreational cannabis began in earnest in the 21st century. Colorado and Washington were pioneers in this respect, both passing measures to legalize recreational cannabis in 2012. Since then, numerous states including California, Oregon, Michigan, and Illinois have followed suit. These state-level legalizations typically allow individuals over the age of 21 to possess and use marijuana within certain limits without fear of criminal penalties. Furthermore, these laws often establish a regulated market for cannabis production and sales which includes licensing requirements as well as quality and safety controls.
Canada represents another notable example where federal legalization has occurred. The Cannabis Act came into effect on October 17th, 2018 making Canada the second country worldwide after Uruguay to formally legalize cannabis nationwide both medically and recreationally. This act allows adults to possess up to 30 grams of legal dried cannabis or equivalent in public space and permits households to grow up to four cannabis plants from licensed seeds.
In contrast to North Americas trend toward liberalization is Asia's general stringency concerning drug offenses including those involving cannabis. Countries like Japan and China maintain harsh policies where possession can lead to severe penalties including long prison sentences or even capital punishment in extreme cases involving trafficking.
Europe presents a mixed picture; some countries like Netherlands have famously tolerated limited forms of cannabis usage through "coffee shops," while others such as France continue largely prohibiting it albeit with some recent movements towards medicinal recognition and decriminalization.
The transition towards legalization often involves complex considerations balancing public health policy social attitudes crime rates economic factors among other facets Each region's approach reflects its unique socio-political landscape For instance proponents argue that legalization reduces black market activity associated violence diverts substantial law enforcement resources towards more severe crimes enhances tax revenues supports consumer safety through regulation Opponents however raise concerns about potential increases substance abuse impaired driving mental health risks especially amongst youths
Overall legalization recreational cannabis remains highly contentious evolving issue It is clear though that as more jurisdictions experiment with different models global dialogue around drug policy will continue evolve inviting reconsideration traditional paradigms surrounding drug use control
The intersection of legal status, research, and development in the context of cannabis is a fascinating and complex topic that has garnered increasing attention in recent years. As countries around the world reconsider their laws regarding cannabis, ranging from medical to recreational use, the implications for scientific research and product development are significant.
The legal status of cannabis has historically been a major barrier to research. In many parts of the world, cannabis remains classified as a controlled substance with no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. This classification has restricted researchers' access to cannabis, limiting their ability to study its properties and potential health benefits extensively. For instance, in countries where cannabis is illegal or strictly controlled, researchers must navigate a labyrinth of bureaucratic hurdles to gain approvals, secure funding, and obtain quality plant materials for study. These obstacles can deter research efforts or skew results due to limitations on the strains or quantities available.
However, regions that have legalized cannabis either for medicinal or recreational purposes have seen a blossoming of research activities. Legalization removes many of the barriers that previously hampered extensive studies. Researchers in these areas can more freely explore the effects of various cannabinoids (the active chemicals in cannabis such as THC and CBD) on health conditions like chronic pain, epilepsy, PTSD, and more without undue legal risk.
Legalization also opens the doors for substantial investment into research and development by both public institutions and private enterprises. For example, pharmaceutical companies may develop new drug formulations derived from cannabinoids that could potentially lead to FDA-approved medications. The beauty industry has seen an influx of products featuring CBD oil purportedly offering benefits such as reduced inflammation and skin calming effects.
Moreover, agricultural research related to cannabis cultivation has expanded under legalization regimes. Scientists are exploring best practices for cultivation that maximize yield and cannabinoid content while minimizing environmental impacts. This type of research directly supports product development within agricultural tech industries focusing on sustainability.
Legal status not only influences scientific exploration but also affects intellectual property considerations within the cannabis industry. In jurisdictions where cannabis is legal, individuals and companies can patent innovative strains of cannabis plants along with new extraction methods or consumption devices – generating opportunities for economic growth through licensing deals or outright sales.
Nevertheless, it's important to note that even within regions that have legalized some form of marijuana use, discrepancies between federal and state laws (as seen in the United States) can still pose challenges. Researchers at federally funded institutions may face restrictions regardless of state laws permitting usage which creates an uneven landscape for R&D efforts across different states.
In conclusion, the legal status of cannabis significantly impacts its related fields of research and development by dictating accessibility for scientific study while shaping economic opportunities within emerging markets tied to this controversial plant. As legislation evolves globally towards greater acceptance or tightened restrictions alike will determine future trajectories not only in science but also in societal health outcomes linked directly back to our understanding facilitated through rigorous research endeavors.
The enforcement and penalties for cannabis-related offenses have varied significantly over time and across different jurisdictions, reflecting a complex tapestry of legal attitudes towards cannabis use and distribution. As countries grapple with the nuances of medicinal benefits, public health concerns, and crime reduction, the legal status of cannabis continues to evolve, influencing how laws are enforced and what penalties are imposed.
Historically, many countries enforced strict penalties for cannabis possession, sale, and cultivation. In the United States, for example, the War on Drugs launched in the 1970s led to stringent laws that classified marijuana alongside highly dangerous drugs like heroin and LSD. This resulted not only in heavy criminal penalties but also in a significant increase in incarcerations for drug-related offenses-disproportionately affecting minority communities.
However, recent years have seen a dramatic shift in this approach. Several states within the U.S., starting with Colorado and Washington in 2012, have legalized recreational cannabis use. These states have established regulatory frameworks to control the cultivation, distribution, and sale of cannabis-much like alcohol or tobacco-while setting age restrictions to prevent underage use. The enforcement focuses more on regulation compliance rather than criminalization: penalties involve fines or business sanctions rather than prison sentences.
In contrast, other countries maintain harsh stances. For instance, some Asian countries like Singapore and Malaysia impose severe punishments for cannabis possession or trafficking-including long imprisonment terms or even the death penalty. The zero-tolerance policies reflect cultural attitudes towards drug use as morally reprehensible and socially harmful.
European approaches tend to be more moderate but vary widely between countries; Portugal decriminalized all drugs including cannabis in 2001 as part of a broader shift towards treating drug use as a public health issue rather than a criminal one. Here enforcement is minimal with emphasis on diversion programs aimed at rehabilitation and recovery rather than punishment.
Penalties typically depend on several factors: the amount of cannabis involved; whether theres intent to sell or distribute; prior convictions; and whether minors were involved. In jurisdictions where cannabis remains illegal without exception, these factors can escalate charges from simple possession (often just requiring a fine or short-term incarceration) to trafficking (which could warrant very lengthy sentences).
Moreover, there has been growing advocacy worldwide aimed at reforming drug laws related to cannabis by arguing that punitive measures have failed to reduce usage rates effectively but instead led to crowded prisons filled with non-violent offenders. This argument aligns with emerging research suggesting that regulated legalization coupled with education about responsible use can potentially reduce overall harm more effectively than prohibitionist policies.
In conclusion, enforcement strategies and penalties for cannabis-related offenses reflect a balance-or tension-between societal norms/values about drug consumption and evolving understandings of its impacts both positive (medicinal uses) and negative (potential abuse). As science advances our understanding of cannabis effects while societal attitudes continue shifting toward normalization or acceptance under controlled conditions-the landscape of law enforcement similarly evolves presenting new challenges but also innovative approaches toward managing this controversial plant within our societies.
Cannabis (/ˈkænÉ™bɪs/ ⓘ)[2] is a genus of flowering plants in the family Cannabaceae that is widely accepted as being indigenous to and originating from the continent of Asia.[3][4][5] However, the number of species is disputed, with as many as three species being recognized: Cannabis sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis. Alternatively, C. ruderalis may be included within C. sativa, or all three may be treated as subspecies of C. sativa,[1][6][7][8] or C. sativa may be accepted as a single undivided species.[9]
The plant is also known as hemp, although this term is usually used to refer only to varieties cultivated for non-drug use. Hemp has long been used for fibre, seeds and their oils, leaves for use as vegetables, and juice. Industrial hemp textile products are made from cannabis plants selected to produce an abundance of fibre.
Cannabis also has a long history of being used for medicinal purposes, and as a recreational drug known by several slang terms, such as marijuana, pot or weed. Various cannabis strains have been bred, often selectively to produce high or low levels of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a cannabinoid and the plant's principal psychoactive constituent. Compounds such as hashish and hash oil are extracted from the plant.[10] More recently, there has been interest in other cannabinoids like cannabidiol (CBD), cannabigerol (CBG), and cannabinol (CBN).
Cannabis is a Scythian word.[11][12][13] The ancient Greeks learned of the use of cannabis by observing Scythian funerals, during which cannabis was consumed.[12] In Akkadian, cannabis was known as qunubu (ðÂޝðÂŽ«ðÂŽ ðÂŽÂð‚).[12] The word was adopted in to the Hebrew language as qaneh bosem (קָנֶ׆בֹּשׂ×Â).[12]
Cannabis is an annual, dioecious, flowering herb. The leaves are palmately compound or digitate, with serrate leaflets.[14] The first pair of leaves usually have a single leaflet, the number gradually increasing up to a maximum of about thirteen leaflets per leaf (usually seven or nine), depending on variety and growing conditions. At the top of a flowering plant, this number again diminishes to a single leaflet per leaf. The lower leaf pairs usually occur in an opposite leaf arrangement and the upper leaf pairs in an alternate arrangement on the main stem of a mature plant.
The leaves have a peculiar and diagnostic venation pattern (which varies slightly among varieties) that allows for easy identification of Cannabis leaves from unrelated species with similar leaves. As is common in serrated leaves, each serration has a central vein extending to its tip, but in Cannabis this originates from lower down the central vein of the leaflet, typically opposite to the position of the second notch down. This means that on its way from the midrib of the leaflet to the point of the serration, the vein serving the tip of the serration passes close by the intervening notch. Sometimes the vein will pass tangentially to the notch, but often will pass by at a small distance; when the latter happens a spur vein (or occasionally two) branches off and joins the leaf margin at the deepest point of the notch. Tiny samples of Cannabis also can be identified with precision by microscopic examination of leaf cells and similar features, requiring special equipment and expertise.[15]
All known strains of Cannabis are wind-pollinated[16] and the fruit is an achene.[17] Most strains of Cannabis are short day plants,[16] with the possible exception of C. sativa subsp. sativa var. spontanea (= C. ruderalis), which is commonly described as "auto-flowering" and may be day-neutral.
Cannabis is predominantly dioecious,[16][18] having imperfect flowers, with staminate "male" and pistillate "female" flowers occurring on separate plants.[19] "At a very early period the Chinese recognized the Cannabis plant as dioecious",[20] and the (c. 3rd century BCE) Erya dictionary defined xi 枲 "male Cannabis" and fu 莩 (or ju 苴) "female Cannabis".[21] Male flowers are normally borne on loose panicles, and female flowers are borne on racemes.[22]
Many monoecious varieties have also been described,[23] in which individual plants bear both male and female flowers.[24] (Although monoecious plants are often referred to as "hermaphrodites", true hermaphrodites – which are less common in Cannabis – bear staminate and pistillate structures together on individual flowers, whereas monoecious plants bear male and female flowers at different locations on the same plant.) Subdioecy (the occurrence of monoecious individuals and dioecious individuals within the same population) is widespread.[25][26][27] Many populations have been described as sexually labile.[28][29][30]
As a result of intensive selection in cultivation, Cannabis exhibits many sexual phenotypes that can be described in terms of the ratio of female to male flowers occurring in the individual, or typical in the cultivar.[31] Dioecious varieties are preferred for drug production, where the fruits (produced by female flowers) are used. Dioecious varieties are also preferred for textile fiber production, whereas monoecious varieties are preferred for pulp and paper production. It has been suggested that the presence of monoecy can be used to differentiate licit crops of monoecious hemp from illicit drug crops,[25] but sativa strains often produce monoecious individuals, which is possibly as a result of inbreeding.
Cannabis has been described as having one of the most complicated mechanisms of sex determination among the dioecious plants.[31] Many models have been proposed to explain sex determination in Cannabis.
Based on studies of sex reversal in hemp, it was first reported by K. Hirata in 1924 that an XY sex-determination system is present.[29] At the time, the XY system was the only known system of sex determination. The X:A system was first described in Drosophila spp in 1925.[32] Soon thereafter, Schaffner disputed Hirata's interpretation,[33] and published results from his own studies of sex reversal in hemp, concluding that an X:A system was in use and that furthermore sex was strongly influenced by environmental conditions.[30]
Since then, many different types of sex determination systems have been discovered, particularly in plants.[18] Dioecy is relatively uncommon in the plant kingdom, and a very low percentage of dioecious plant species have been determined to use the XY system. In most cases where the XY system is found it is believed to have evolved recently and independently.[34]
Since the 1920s, a number of sex determination models have been proposed for Cannabis. Ainsworth describes sex determination in the genus as using "an X/autosome dosage type".[18]
The question of whether heteromorphic sex chromosomes are indeed present is most conveniently answered if such chromosomes were clearly visible in a karyotype. Cannabis was one of the first plant species to be karyotyped; however, this was in a period when karyotype preparation was primitive by modern standards. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes were reported to occur in staminate individuals of dioecious "Kentucky" hemp, but were not found in pistillate individuals of the same variety. Dioecious "Kentucky" hemp was assumed to use an XY mechanism. Heterosomes were not observed in analyzed individuals of monoecious "Kentucky" hemp, nor in an unidentified German cultivar. These varieties were assumed to have sex chromosome composition XX.[35] According to other researchers, no modern karyotype of Cannabis had been published as of 1996.[36] Proponents of the XY system state that Y chromosome is slightly larger than the X, but difficult to differentiate cytologically.[37]
More recently, Sakamoto and various co-authors[38][39] have used random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to isolate several genetic marker sequences that they name Male-Associated DNA in Cannabis (MADC), and which they interpret as indirect evidence of a male chromosome. Several other research groups have reported identification of male-associated markers using RAPD and amplified fragment length polymorphism.[40][28][41] Ainsworth commented on these findings, stating,
It is not surprising that male-associated markers are relatively abundant. In dioecious plants where sex chromosomes have not been identified, markers for maleness indicate either the presence of sex chromosomes which have not been distinguished by cytological methods or that the marker is tightly linked to a gene involved in sex determination.[18]
Environmental sex determination is known to occur in a variety of species.[42] Many researchers have suggested that sex in Cannabis is determined or strongly influenced by environmental factors.[30] Ainsworth reviews that treatment with auxin and ethylene have feminizing effects, and that treatment with cytokinins and gibberellins have masculinizing effects.[18] It has been reported that sex can be reversed in Cannabis using chemical treatment.[43] A polymerase chain reaction-based method for the detection of female-associated DNA polymorphisms by genotyping has been developed.[44]
Cannabis plants produce a large number of chemicals as part of their defense against herbivory. One group of these is called cannabinoids, which induce mental and physical effects when consumed.
Cannabinoids, terpenes, terpenoids, and other compounds are secreted by glandular trichomes that occur most abundantly on the floral calyxes and bracts of female plants.[46]
Cannabis, like many organisms, is diploid, having a chromosome complement of 2n=20, although polyploid individuals have been artificially produced.[47] The first genome sequence of Cannabis, which is estimated to be 820 Mb in size, was published in 2011 by a team of Canadian scientists.[48]
The genus Cannabis was formerly placed in the nettle family (Urticaceae) or mulberry family (Moraceae), and later, along with the genus Humulus (hops), in a separate family, the hemp family (Cannabaceae sensu stricto).[49] Recent phylogenetic studies based on cpDNA restriction site analysis and gene sequencing strongly suggest that the Cannabaceae sensu stricto arose from within the former family Celtidaceae, and that the two families should be merged to form a single monophyletic family, the Cannabaceae sensu lato.[50][51]
Various types of Cannabis have been described, and variously classified as species, subspecies, or varieties:[52]
Cannabis plants produce a unique family of terpeno-phenolic compounds called cannabinoids, some of which produce the "high" which may be experienced from consuming marijuana. There are 483 identifiable chemical constituents known to exist in the cannabis plant,[53] and at least 85 different cannabinoids have been isolated from the plant.[54] The two cannabinoids usually produced in greatest abundance are cannabidiol (CBD) and/or Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), but only THC is psychoactive.[55] Since the early 1970s, Cannabis plants have been categorized by their chemical phenotype or "chemotype", based on the overall amount of THC produced, and on the ratio of THC to CBD.[56] Although overall cannabinoid production is influenced by environmental factors, the THC/CBD ratio is genetically determined and remains fixed throughout the life of a plant.[40] Non-drug plants produce relatively low levels of THC and high levels of CBD, while drug plants produce high levels of THC and low levels of CBD. When plants of these two chemotypes cross-pollinate, the plants in the first filial (F1) generation have an intermediate chemotype and produce intermediate amounts of CBD and THC. Female plants of this chemotype may produce enough THC to be utilized for drug production.[56][57]
Whether the drug and non-drug, cultivated and wild types of Cannabis constitute a single, highly variable species, or the genus is polytypic with more than one species, has been a subject of debate for well over two centuries. This is a contentious issue because there is no universally accepted definition of a species.[58] One widely applied criterion for species recognition is that species are "groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups."[59] Populations that are physiologically capable of interbreeding, but morphologically or genetically divergent and isolated by geography or ecology, are sometimes considered to be separate species.[59] Physiological barriers to reproduction are not known to occur within Cannabis, and plants from widely divergent sources are interfertile.[47] However, physical barriers to gene exchange (such as the Himalayan mountain range) might have enabled Cannabis gene pools to diverge before the onset of human intervention, resulting in speciation.[60] It remains controversial whether sufficient morphological and genetic divergence occurs within the genus as a result of geographical or ecological isolation to justify recognition of more than one species.[61][62][63]
The genus Cannabis was first classified using the "modern" system of taxonomic nomenclature by Carl Linnaeus in 1753, who devised the system still in use for the naming of species.[64] He considered the genus to be monotypic, having just a single species that he named Cannabis sativa L.[a 1] Linnaeus was familiar with European hemp, which was widely cultivated at the time. This classification was supported by Christiaan Hendrik Persoon (in 1807), Lindley (in 1838) and De Candollee (in 1867). These first classification attempts resulted in a four group division:[65]
In 1785, evolutionary biologist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck published a description of a second species of Cannabis, which he named Cannabis indica Lam.[66] Lamarck based his description of the newly named species on morphological aspects (trichomes, leaf shape) and geographic localization of plant specimens collected in India. He described C. indica as having poorer fiber quality than C. sativa, but greater utility as an inebriant. Also, C. indica was considered smaller, by Lamarck. Also, woodier stems, alternate ramifications of the branches, narrow leaflets, and a villous calyx in the female flowers were characteristics noted by the botanist.[65]
In 1843, William O’Shaughnessy, used "Indian hemp (C. indica)" in a work title. The author claimed that this choice wasn't based on a clear distinction between C. sativa and C. indica, but may have been influenced by the choice to use the term "Indian hemp" (linked to the plant's history in India), hence naming the species as indica.[65]
Additional Cannabis species were proposed in the 19th century, including strains from China and Vietnam (Indo-China) assigned the names Cannabis chinensis Delile, and Cannabis gigantea Delile ex Vilmorin.[67] However, many taxonomists found these putative species difficult to distinguish. In the early 20th century, the single-species concept (monotypic classification) was still widely accepted, except in the Soviet Union, where Cannabis continued to be the subject of active taxonomic study. The name Cannabis indica was listed in various Pharmacopoeias, and was widely used to designate Cannabis suitable for the manufacture of medicinal preparations.[68]
In 1924, Russian botanist D.E. Janichevsky concluded that ruderal Cannabis in central Russia is either a variety of C. sativa or a separate species, and proposed C. sativa L. var. ruderalis Janisch, and Cannabis ruderalis Janisch, as alternative names.[52] In 1929, renowned plant explorer Nikolai Vavilov assigned wild or feral populations of Cannabis in Afghanistan to C. indica Lam. var. kafiristanica Vav., and ruderal populations in Europe to C. sativa L. var. spontanea Vav.[57][67] Vavilov, in 1931, proposed a three species system, independently reinforced by Schultes et al (1975)[69] and Emboden (1974):[70] C. sativa, C. indica and C. ruderalis.[65]
In 1940, Russian botanists Serebriakova and Sizov proposed a complex poly-species classification in which they also recognized C. sativa and C. indica as separate species. Within C. sativa they recognized two subspecies: C. sativa L. subsp. culta Serebr. (consisting of cultivated plants), and C. sativa L. subsp. spontanea (Vav.) Serebr. (consisting of wild or feral plants). Serebriakova and Sizov split the two C. sativa subspecies into 13 varieties, including four distinct groups within subspecies culta. However, they did not divide C. indica into subspecies or varieties.[52][71][72] Zhukovski, in 1950, also proposed a two-species system, but with C. sativa L. and C. ruderalis.[73]
In the 1970s, the taxonomic classification of Cannabis took on added significance in North America. Laws prohibiting Cannabis in the United States and Canada specifically named products of C. sativa as prohibited materials. Enterprising attorneys for the defense in a few drug busts argued that the seized Cannabis material may not have been C. sativa, and was therefore not prohibited by law. Attorneys on both sides recruited botanists to provide expert testimony. Among those testifying for the prosecution was Dr. Ernest Small, while Dr. Richard E. Schultes and others testified for the defense. The botanists engaged in heated debate (outside of court), and both camps impugned the other's integrity.[61][62] The defense attorneys were not often successful in winning their case, because the intent of the law was clear.[74]
In 1976, Canadian botanist Ernest Small[75] and American taxonomist Arthur Cronquist published a taxonomic revision that recognizes a single species of Cannabis with two subspecies (hemp or drug; based on THC and CBD levels) and two varieties in each (domesticated or wild). The framework is thus:
This classification was based on several factors including interfertility, chromosome uniformity, chemotype, and numerical analysis of phenotypic characters.[56][67][76]
Professors William Emboden, Loran Anderson, and Harvard botanist Richard E. Schultes and coworkers also conducted taxonomic studies of Cannabis in the 1970s, and concluded that stable morphological differences exist that support recognition of at least three species, C. sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis.[77][78][79][80] For Schultes, this was a reversal of his previous interpretation that Cannabis is monotypic, with only a single species.[81] According to Schultes' and Anderson's descriptions, C. sativa is tall and laxly branched with relatively narrow leaflets, C. indica is shorter, conical in shape, and has relatively wide leaflets, and C. ruderalis is short, branchless, and grows wild in Central Asia. This taxonomic interpretation was embraced by Cannabis aficionados who commonly distinguish narrow-leafed "sativa" strains from wide-leafed "indica" strains.[82] McPartland's review finds the Schultes taxonomy inconsistent with prior work (protologs) and partly responsible for the popular usage.[83]
Molecular analytical techniques developed in the late 20th century are being applied to questions of taxonomic classification. This has resulted in many reclassifications based on evolutionary systematics. Several studies of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and other types of genetic markers have been conducted on drug and fiber strains of Cannabis, primarily for plant breeding and forensic purposes.[84][85][28][86][87] Dutch Cannabis researcher E.P.M. de Meijer and coworkers described some of their RAPD studies as showing an "extremely high" degree of genetic polymorphism between and within populations, suggesting a high degree of potential variation for selection, even in heavily selected hemp cultivars.[40] They also commented that these analyses confirm the continuity of the Cannabis gene pool throughout the studied accessions, and provide further confirmation that the genus consists of a single species, although theirs was not a systematic study per se.
An investigation of genetic, morphological, and chemotaxonomic variation among 157 Cannabis accessions of known geographic origin, including fiber, drug, and feral populations showed cannabinoid variation in Cannabis germplasm. The patterns of cannabinoid variation support recognition of C. sativa and C. indica as separate species, but not C. ruderalis. C. sativa contains fiber and seed landraces, and feral populations, derived from Europe, Central Asia, and Turkey. Narrow-leaflet and wide-leaflet drug accessions, southern and eastern Asian hemp accessions, and feral Himalayan populations were assigned to C. indica.[57] In 2005, a genetic analysis of the same set of accessions led to a three-species classification, recognizing C. sativa, C. indica, and (tentatively) C. ruderalis.[60] Another paper in the series on chemotaxonomic variation in the terpenoid content of the essential oil of Cannabis revealed that several wide-leaflet drug strains in the collection had relatively high levels of certain sesquiterpene alcohols, including guaiol and isomers of eudesmol, that set them apart from the other putative taxa.[88]
A 2020 analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms reports five clusters of cannabis, roughly corresponding to hemps (including folk "Ruderalis") folk "Indica" and folk "Sativa".[89]
Despite advanced analytical techniques, much of the cannabis used recreationally is inaccurately classified. One laboratory at the University of British Columbia found that Jamaican Lamb's Bread, claimed to be 100% sativa, was in fact almost 100% indica (the opposite strain).[90] Legalization of cannabis in Canada (as of 17 October 2018[update]) may help spur private-sector research, especially in terms of diversification of strains. It should also improve classification accuracy for cannabis used recreationally. Legalization coupled with Canadian government (Health Canada) oversight of production and labelling will likely result in more—and more accurate—testing to determine exact strains and content. Furthermore, the rise of craft cannabis growers in Canada should ensure quality, experimentation/research, and diversification of strains among private-sector producers.[91]
The scientific debate regarding taxonomy has had little effect on the terminology in widespread use among cultivators and users of drug-type Cannabis. Cannabis aficionados recognize three distinct types based on such factors as morphology, native range, aroma, and subjective psychoactive characteristics. "Sativa" is the most widespread variety, which is usually tall, laxly branched, and found in warm lowland regions. "Indica" designates shorter, bushier plants adapted to cooler climates and highland environments. "Ruderalis" is the informal name for the short plants that grow wild in Europe and Central Asia.[83]
Mapping the morphological concepts to scientific names in the Small 1976 framework, "Sativa" generally refers to C. sativa subsp. indica var. indica, "Indica" generally refers to C. sativa subsp. i. kafiristanica (also known as afghanica), and "Ruderalis", being lower in THC, is the one that can fall into C. sativa subsp. sativa. The three names fit in Schultes's framework better, if one overlooks its inconsistencies with prior work.[83] Definitions of the three terms using factors other than morphology produces different, often conflicting results.
Breeders, seed companies, and cultivators of drug type Cannabis often describe the ancestry or gross phenotypic characteristics of cultivars by categorizing them as "pure indica", "mostly indica", "indica/sativa", "mostly sativa", or "pure sativa". These categories are highly arbitrary, however: one "AK-47" hybrid strain has received both "Best Sativa" and "Best Indica" awards.[83]
Cannabis likely split from its closest relative, Humulus (hops), during the mid Oligocene, around 27.8 million years ago according to molecular clock estimates. The centre of origin of Cannabis is likely in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. The pollen of Humulus and Cannabis are very similar and difficult to distinguish. The oldest pollen thought to be from Cannabis is from Ningxia, China, on the boundary between the Tibetan Plateau and the Loess Plateau, dating to the early Miocene, around 19.6 million years ago. Cannabis was widely distributed over Asia by the Late Pleistocene. The oldest known Cannabis in South Asia dates to around 32,000 years ago.[92]
Cannabis is used for a wide variety of purposes.
According to genetic and archaeological evidence, cannabis was first domesticated about 12,000 years ago in East Asia during the early Neolithic period.[5] The use of cannabis as a mind-altering drug has been documented by archaeological finds in prehistoric societies in Eurasia and Africa.[93] The oldest written record of cannabis usage is the Greek historian Herodotus's reference to the central Eurasian Scythians taking cannabis steam baths.[94] His Histories (c. 440 BCE) records, "The Scythians, as I said, take some of this hemp-seed [presumably, flowers], and, creeping under the felt coverings, throw it upon the red-hot stones; immediately it smokes, and gives out such a vapour as no Greek vapour-bath can exceed; the Scyths, delighted, shout for joy."[95]
In China, the psychoactive properties of cannabis are described in the Shennong Bencaojing (3rd century AD).[96] Cannabis smoke was inhaled by Daoists, who burned it in incense burners.[96]
In the Middle East, use spread throughout the Islamic empire to North Africa. In 1545, cannabis spread to the western hemisphere where Spaniards imported it to Chile for its use as fiber. In North America, cannabis, in the form of hemp, was grown for use in rope, cloth and paper.[97][98][99][100]
Cannabinol (CBN) was the first compound to be isolated from cannabis extract in the late 1800s. Its structure and chemical synthesis were achieved by 1940, followed by some of the first preclinical research studies to determine the effects of individual cannabis-derived compounds in vivo.[101]
Globally, in 2013, 60,400 kilograms of cannabis were produced legally.[102]
Cannabis is a popular recreational drug around the world, only behind alcohol, caffeine, and tobacco. In the U.S. alone, it is believed that over 100 million Americans have tried cannabis, with 25 million Americans having used it within the past year.[when?][104] As a drug it usually comes in the form of dried marijuana, hashish, or various extracts collectively known as hashish oil.[10]
Normal cognition is restored after approximately three hours for larger doses via a smoking pipe, bong or vaporizer.[105] However, if a large amount is taken orally the effects may last much longer. After 24 hours to a few days, minuscule psychoactive effects may be felt, depending on dosage, frequency and tolerance to the drug.
Cannabidiol (CBD), which has no intoxicating effects by itself[55] (although sometimes showing a small stimulant effect, similar to caffeine),[106] is thought to reduce the anxiety-inducing effects of high doses of THC,[107] particularly if administered orally prior to THC exposure.[108]
According to Delphic analysis by British researchers in 2007, cannabis has a lower risk factor for dependence compared to both nicotine and alcohol.[109] However, everyday use of cannabis may be correlated with psychological withdrawal symptoms, such as irritability or insomnia,[105] and susceptibility to a panic attack may increase as levels of THC metabolites rise.[110][111] Cannabis withdrawal symptoms are typically mild and are not life-threatening.[112] Risk of adverse outcomes from cannabis use may be reduced by implementation of evidence-based education and intervention tools communicated to the public with practical regulation measures.[113]
In 2014 there were an estimated 182.5 million cannabis users worldwide (3.8% of the global population aged 15–64).[114] This percentage did not change significantly between 1998 and 2014.[114][needs update]
Medical cannabis (or medical marijuana) refers to the use of cannabis and its constituent cannabinoids, in an effort to treat disease or improve symptoms. Cannabis is used to reduce nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy, to improve appetite in people with HIV/AIDS, and to treat chronic pain and muscle spasms.[115][116] Cannabinoids are under preliminary research for their potential to affect stroke.[117] Evidence is lacking for depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Tourette syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, and psychosis.[118] Two extracts of cannabis – dronabinol and nabilone – are approved by the FDA as medications in pill form for treating the side effects of chemotherapy and AIDS.[119]
Short-term use increases both minor and major adverse effects.[116] Common side effects include dizziness, feeling tired, vomiting, and hallucinations.[116] Long-term effects of cannabis are not clear.[120] Concerns including memory and cognition problems, risk of addiction, schizophrenia in young people, and the risk of children taking it by accident.[115]
The term hemp is used to name the durable soft fiber from the Cannabis plant stem (stalk). Cannabis sativa cultivars are used for fibers due to their long stems; Sativa varieties may grow more than six metres tall. However, hemp can refer to any industrial or foodstuff product that is not intended for use as a drug. Many countries regulate limits for psychoactive compound (THC) concentrations in products labeled as hemp.
Cannabis for industrial uses is valuable in tens of thousands of commercial products, especially as fibre[121] ranging from paper, cordage, construction material[122][123] and textiles in general, to clothing. Hemp is stronger and longer-lasting than cotton. It also is a useful source of foodstuffs (hemp milk, hemp seed, hemp oil) and biofuels. Hemp has been used by many civilizations, from China to Europe (and later North America) during the last 12,000 years.[121][124] In modern times novel applications and improvements have been explored with modest commercial success.[125][126]
In the US, "industrial hemp" is classified by the federal government as cannabis containing no more than 0.3% THC by dry weight. This classification was established in the 2018 Farm Bill and was refined to include hemp-sourced extracts, cannabinoids, and derivatives in the definition of hemp.[127]
The cannabis plant has a history of medicinal use dating back thousands of years across many cultures.[128] The Yanghai Tombs, a vast ancient cemetery (54 000 m2) situated in the Turfan district of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in northwest China, have revealed the 2700-year-old grave of a shaman. He is thought to have belonged to the Jushi culture recorded in the area centuries later in the Hanshu, Chap 96B.[129] Near the head and foot of the shaman was a large leather basket and wooden bowl filled with 789g of cannabis, superbly preserved by climatic and burial conditions. An international team demonstrated that this material contained THC. The cannabis was presumably employed by this culture as a medicinal or psychoactive agent, or an aid to divination. This is the oldest documentation of cannabis as a pharmacologically active agent.[130] The earliest evidence of cannabis smoking has been found in the 2,500-year-old tombs of Jirzankal Cemetery in the Pamir Mountains in Western China, where cannabis residue were found in burners with charred pebbles possibly used during funeral rituals.[131][132]
Settlements which date from c. 2200–1700 BCE in the Bactria and Margiana contained elaborate ritual structures with rooms containing everything needed for making drinks containing extracts from poppy (opium), hemp (cannabis), and ephedra (which contains ephedrine).[133]: 262 Although there is no evidence of ephedra being used by steppe tribes, they engaged in cultic use of hemp. Cultic use ranged from Romania to the Yenisei River and had begun by 3rd millennium BC Smoking hemp has been found at Pazyryk.[133]: 306â€Å
Cannabis is first referred to in Hindu Vedas between 2000 and 1400 BCE, in the Atharvaveda. By the 10th century CE, it has been suggested that it was referred to by some in India as "food of the gods".[134] Cannabis use eventually became a ritual part of the Hindu festival of Holi. One of the earliest to use this plant in medical purposes was Korakkar, one of the 18 Siddhas.[135][136][self-published source?] The plant is called Korakkar Mooli in the Tamil language, meaning Korakkar's herb.[137][138]
In Buddhism, cannabis is generally regarded as an intoxicant and may be a hindrance to development of meditation and clear awareness. In ancient Germanic culture, cannabis was associated with the Norse love goddess, Freya.[139][140] An anointing oil mentioned in Exodus is, by some translators, said to contain cannabis.[141]
In modern times, the Rastafari movement has embraced cannabis as a sacrament.[142] Elders of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church, a religious movement founded in the U.S. in 1975 with no ties to either Ethiopia or the Coptic Church, consider cannabis to be the Eucharist, claiming it as an oral tradition from Ethiopia dating back to the time of Christ.[143] Like the Rastafari, some modern Gnostic Christian sects have asserted that cannabis is the Tree of Life.[144][145] Other organized religions founded in the 20th century that treat cannabis as a sacrament are the THC Ministry,[146] Cantheism,[147] the Cannabis Assembly[148] and the Church of Cognizance.
Since the 13th century CE, cannabis has been used among Sufis[149][150] – the mystical interpretation of Islam that exerts strong influence over local Muslim practices in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Turkey, and Pakistan. Cannabis preparations are frequently used at Sufi festivals in those countries.[149] Pakistan's Shrine of Lal Shahbaz Qalandar in Sindh province is particularly renowned for the widespread use of cannabis at the shrine's celebrations, especially its annual Urs festival and Thursday evening dhamaal sessions – or meditative dancing sessions.[151][152]
Cannabis is called kaneh bosem in Hebrew, which is now recognized as the Scythian word that Herodotus wrote as kánnabis (or cannabis).
Cannabis is a Scythian word (Benet 1975).
cite book
During the festival the air is heavy with drumbeats, chanting and cannabis smoke.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/TREND+IN+DIGITALS/New+Mexico/@34.9727305,-105.0323635,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJq6qqqqqqHocREcg2mYwJ31U!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!1m5!1m1!1sChIJqVKY50NQGIcRup41Yxpuv0Y!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!3e0
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/IT+Agency/New+Mexico/@34.9727305,-105.0323635,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJq6qqqqqqHocROPFE8do4dUI!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!1m5!1m1!1sChIJqVKY50NQGIcRup41Yxpuv0Y!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!3e2
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Ceniti+Clothing+Pvt+Ltd/New+Mexico/@34.9727305,-105.0323635,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJq6qqqqqqHocRGeIsqBwHd_Q!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!1m5!1m1!1sChIJqVKY50NQGIcRup41Yxpuv0Y!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!3e1
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Chimayo/New+Mexico/@34.9727305,-105.0323635,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJey_FDQCrHocRvK_74vNUQcA!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!1m5!1m1!1sChIJqVKY50NQGIcRup41Yxpuv0Y!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!3e3
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Fts+Intermodal/New+Mexico/@34.9727305,-105.0323635,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJq6qqqqqqHocRG7fBJK2fi7I!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!1m5!1m1!1sChIJqVKY50NQGIcRup41Yxpuv0Y!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!3e0
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/ezysoft/New+Mexico/@34.9727305,-105.0323635,14z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1sChIJq6qqqqqqHocR0G0Hhuz_pB8!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!1m5!1m1!1sChIJqVKY50NQGIcRup41Yxpuv0Y!2m2!1d-105.0323635!2d34.9727305!3e2